In the first half of the 20th century, the name Universe was used to mean the whole spacetime continuum in which we exist, together with all the energy and matter within it. Attempts to understand the Universe in this sense, on the largest possible scales, are made in cosmology, a science that has grown from physics and astronomy. During the second half of the 20th century, the development of observational cosmology, also called physical cosmology, led to a split in the meaning of the word Universe, between observational cosmologists and theoretical cosmologists; where the former (usually) abandon the hope of observing the whole spacetime continuum, the latter retain this hope, attempting to find the most reasonable speculations for modelling the whole of spacetime, despite the extreme difficulty in imagining any empirical constraints on these speculations and the risk of declining into metaphysics.
The terms known universe, observable universe, or visible universe are often used to describe the part of the Universe that we can see or otherwise observe. Those who believe it is impossible to observe the whole continuum may use our universe, referring only to that knowable by human beings in particular.
The most important result of cosmology, that the Universe is expanding, is derived from redshift observations and quantified by Hubble's Law. Extrapolating this expansion back in time, one approaches a gravitational singularity, a rather abstract mathematical concept, which may or may not correspond to reality. This gives rise to the Big Bang theory, the dominant model in cosmology today. The time=zero of the Big Bang was estimated to have happened about 13.7 billion (13.7 × 109) years ago, with an uncertainty of 200 million years, according to NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe project (WMAP). Some recent studies, however, found the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen (CNO) cycle to be two times slower than previously believed, leading to the conclusion that the Universe must be at least 14.7 billion years old.
The actual age of the universe can be calculated directly from the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB). Using Planck units, the age of the universe is simply the inverse square of its temperature. This gives an age of 15.556 billion years, with an uncertainty of only 24 million years, thanks in part to the accurate CMB temperature measurement made by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE).
A fundamental aspect of the Big Bang can be seen today in the observation that the farther away from us galaxies are, the faster they move away from us. It can also be seen in the microwave background radiation which is the much-attenuated radiation that originated soon after the Big Bang. This background radiation is remarkably uniform in all directions, which cosmologists have attempted to explain by an initial period of rapid inflation following the Big Bang.
However, the observable universe, consisting of all locations that could have affected us since the Big Bang given the finite speed of light, is certainly finite. The edge of the cosmic light horizon is 13.7 billion light years distant. The present distance (comoving distance) to the edge of the observable universe is larger, since the universe has been expanding; it is estimated to be about 78 billion light years (7.4 × 1023 km). This would make the comoving volume, of the known universe, equal to 1.9 × 1033 cubic light years (assuming this region is perfectly spherical). The observable universe contains about 7 × 1022stars, organized in about 1010galaxies, which themselves form clusters and superclusters. The number of galaxies may be even larger, based on the Hubble Deep Field observed with the Hubble Space Telescope.
The reader should be warned that both popular and professional research articles in cosmology often use the term "Universe" when they really mean "observable universe". This is because unobservable physical phenomena are scientifically irrelevant. Thus the term our...
We live in the centre of the universe that we observe, in apparent contradiction to the Copernican principle which says that the Universe is more or less uniform and it has no distinguished centre. This is simply because light does not travel infinitely fast, and we make observations of the past. As we look further and further away, we see things from epochs (times) closer and closer to the limit of time=zero of the Big bang model. And since light travels at the same speed in any direction towards us, we live at the centre of our observable universe.
Firstly, whether or not the Universe is flat, i.e. whether the rules of Euclidean geometry are valid on the largest scales, is unknown. Currently, most cosmologists believe that the observable universe is (nearly) flat, with local wrinkles where massive objects distort spacetime, just as a lake is (nearly) flat. This opinion was strengthened by the latest data from WMAP, looking at "acoustic oscillations" in the cosmic background radiation temperature variations.
Secondly, whether or not the Universe is multiply connected, is unknown. The Universe has no spatial boundary according to the standard Big bang model, but nevertheless may be spatially finite. This can be understood using a two-dimensional analogy: a sphere has no edge, but nonetheless has a finite area (4πR2). It is a two-dimensional surface with constant curvature in a third dimension. A three-dimensional equivalent is the unbounded "spherical space" discovered by Bernhard Riemann, which has a finite volume (2π2R3). In it, all three dimensions are constantly curved in a fourth. (Other possibilities include a similar "elliptical space", and a "cylindrical space", where, in conflict with ordinary geometry, the two ends of the cylinder are joined together, but without bending the cylinder. These, also, are two-dimensional spaces with finite areas; innumerable others exist. However, the sphere has the unique and, perhaps, more aesthetically pleasing property that all points on it are geometrically similar.) If the universe is indeed unbounded yet spatially finite, as described, then traveling in a "straight" line, in any given direction, would theoretically cause one to eventually arrive back at the starting point after traveling a distance equal to the "circumference" of the universe (which is impossible to our current understanding of the Universe, as it size is much greater than the size of the observable universe).
Strictly speaking, we should call the stars and galaxies "views" of stars and galaxies, since it is possible that the Universe is multiply-connected and sufficiently small (and of an appropriate, perhaps complex, shape) that we can see once or several times around it in various, and perhaps all, directions. (Think of a house of mirrors.) If so, the actual number of physically distinct stars and galaxies would be be smaller than currently accounted. Although this possibility has not been ruled out, the results of latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) research make this very unlikely.
Although words like world and its equivalents in other language now almost always refer to the planet Earth, they previously referred to everything that exists—see Copernicus, for example—and still sometimes do (as in "the whole wide world").
When speculating about a multiverse, one often thinks of it as consisting of many "universes" (lower case), our Universe being one of them.
Fractal Cosmology Denies the Big Bang theory and claims that the universe is of infinitely replicated fractal structure. http://www.fractalcosmology.com/
The Living Cosmos Argues that biological universe is stabilized by life and that planets, galaxies, and other objects are similar at the phenomenological level. http://www.livingcosmos.com/
Cosmic Perspective Book which claims to eliminate the Big Bang as a viable theory of creation. http://www.webservr.com/science/
Cosmos 2000 Recent discovery of the nature of atomic particles reveals a meaning of the Universe. http://www.cosmos2000.org/
Cosmology and Dark Matter Cosmology article about emerging universe theory. http://users.erols.com/sclufer/
Metrology, Minkowsky and Time Space generates time forming the spacetime named Chronochor. http://www.burcomm.net/nouvellepage12.htm
Toward Quantum Cosmology A simple model of universe. http://www.fortunecity.com/marina/highseas/179/
The Reason of the Universe The key to the explanation of the universe's origins is the so called physics of the antigravity http://www.kki.pl/hommyr/indexe.html
Cube Theory This site etempts to explain the structure of the universe. http://gebman.0catch.com/index.htm
Living Universe A personal vision of the origin of the universe. http://www.livinguniverseweb.com/index.html
The New Concept of Cosmology Based on unity of reason and unity in the nature of physical processes. http://www.lermus.ru/users/trunaev
Big Tube Theory (TOE) Mass is created by a very special non-euclidean manifold. http://www.hollywood.org/cosmology/index.html
Vortex A model of the universe as a double vortex, joined at their open cones. http://www.schoon-wiltonvortex.info
Electric cosmos Proposes a cosmology based primarily on electrical phenomena. http://www.electric-cosmos.org/
Theory of Reciprocity A Newtonian approach to understanding the phenomenon of existence and the nature of the cosmos. http://www.theory-of-reciprocity.com/
Cosmology Without Big Bang The right Hubble Law is derived to obtain a cosmology with expansion but without Big Bang. In German and English. http://www.wissenschaft-in-not.de/
Science, Metaphysics, and Reductionism Purely from logical and scientific arguments, it can be concluded that there must have been a primary principle prior to the Big Bang http://freethought.8m.net/
Multifractal univese - from cosmology to biology Multimedia presentation of multifractal universe which links cosmology to biology. http://rejnet.worldmultimedia.biz/Science/mainstartpage_science.htm
Universe as Turbulence and Model of Structure Formation A paper describing possible evidence against big-bang cosmology and support for a fractal universe. http://www.phys.ntnu.no/~rej/Fractal_structure/Seminar_lecture/Seminar_lecture_1.html
The Cause of the Cosmological Red Shift The red shift is caused by gravitational interaction with masses passed in space, thus there is no expansion of galaxies. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/4317/redaw.html
Seven Dimensional (and up) Einsteinian Hyperspherical Universe Updated material from the archived "Cosmology Review" site written in cooperation with UNC. A conceptualization in plain English of an eternal, dual, periodic universe model according to Special and General Relativity. http://www.fm/7-sphere/
Personal Cosmology A philosophical study of the Cosmos. Believing that the Cosmos has a very simple basis. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ajfgyro/
Center of the Universe Publishing Offers the book "21st Century's all New Cosmology" for sale, and a sample chapter for free download. http://www.allnewuniverse.com/
Cosmic Queries To persons perplexed by the cosmos. Is the space picture a hostage of the sunlight? http://cosmicqueries.freehomepage.com/
Simple World Explanation Best solutions for hierarchical system of matter in cosm, world formula, wave mechanics bound with relativity, chat about it, downloads of articles and cohesions http://members.fortunecity.com/arcun/
An Alternative View of the Universe Idea How do we know that there really is such a thing as the universe? Here is an analysis of the universe idea that leads to a startling conclusion. http://universeontrial.tripod.com/index.html
David Calder Hardy A new theory of the origin of the solar system. http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~hardy/
The Collapsing Universe Observed phenomena explained in terms of a nonhomogeneous closed universe, with a central singularity, undergoing gravitational collapse. http://www.btinternet.com/~mtgradwell/
A hierarchical and infinite universe our universe is infinite both in size and in complexity, infinite complexity and infinite expanse are part of the infinite universe. http://www.geocities.com/ignatius2000_2001/
Exploding the Big Bang Theory Was the Big Bang the Beginning of the Universe? Article examining this controversial situation. Readers can add their response. http://www.rubak.com/article.cfm?ID=14
The temporalist model versus the Hot Big Bang The temporalist model is opposed to the Hot Big Bang, to the recession of the galaxies.It proposes a new interpretation of the redshifts and of the constant H of Hubble with a theoretical value of 67,71 Km/sec/Mpc established in 1962 http://www.ifrance.com/recessiongalaxies/
Discovery of the Anti-Universe A new cosmological model called the Chaos Cosmos model. http://www.kiruna.se/~akejean/cosmos.html
Cosmology and Superstrings Momentons and 10 dimensional spacetime. http://home.att.net/~bob.rutkiewicz/cosmology_and_superstrings.htm
Cosmic Repulsion Online text of a book postulating the existence of a repulsive force, to explain the observed expansion of the universe without exotic dark matter. Aimed at a popular audience. http://www.empyreanquest.com/repulse.htm
Scale Relativity Fractal relativity. Spacetime is non-differentiable. http://www.daec.obspm.fr/users/nottale/ukmenure.htm
WingMakers, The Ancient Arrow Project Introduces a new cosmology and a future vision of our universe and our purpose therein. http://www.wingmakers.com/
Theories of the Universe New radical theories and possibilities about the Universe. http://www.theories.gq.nu/
New Picture of the Universe A universe made of one self-reproducing multiscale interaction. http://www.eugenesavov.com/
Cosmic Commode A proposed resolution of general relativity theory and an alternative to the Big Bang theory of cosmological creation. http://www.thecosmiccommode.com/
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.